#1 August 4th, 2004 10:13 PM

hotstone04
Member

The "shag' argument

Dear Mr/Mss Head

As a newcomer to ISM I would like to take this opportunity and let it to be known from me to all the girls who have and who are thinking of submitting a folio/s that you are all magically wonderful and not one falls below muster, and the thought of being on a South Sea island with ALL them, on my own - well that's enough of that dream, this is the reason I'm reluctant to comment on any individual girl for fear of making her my favourite, I have room for all of them in my heart and mind, yes the more artistic ones do show a little more imagination and some a lot more, but I'll not criticise them for that as that's what art is all about, to extend and improve the art form.
Also I have been reading the controversy that is raging about the way the site is being used and the way 'Head' uses his/her editing powers and members use the comments section.
Now as I said at the beginning I'm a newcomer but did a watching brief and considered it worthy of membership, so have no wish to add to the conflict (which I doubt).
One thing apparent and that is both sides have a valid points to make, I presume Head is one of the founders of the site so had the rights to make the rules, but they have to be work too without compromise, unless someone can prove certain changes can be made but to agreement of the majority of the prescribers and administrators that they make an improvement to the site, the very reason for the forum.
I for one would not renew my membership if more of the 'shag' kind of folio are excepted as our honourable member (sounds like the HP in London), has so strongly stated this is not what attracted me to the site, there's enough of that kind to be readily found all throughout the world web, but as 'Head' has rightly pointed out it's in the forum where this problem should be discussed and resolved.
That brings me to Head's role in all this, if he/she is/are the founders of the site and made the rules then they have work by them don't say "oh we'll let that one through," and which brought this controversy on, as that's only going to encourage others to try the same and making editorial decisions more difficult. Even girl on girl I'm not always happy with but accept it as others may.
To sum up, our honourable friend thought to complain to the folio submitters to show his dislike of the contents but the rules as they are do not permit that so, it's in the forum ones make the statement, then should 'Head' have allow the folio to be put on the site in first place. My personal thoughts are the folio should not have been allowed in first place and our honourable friend was right to make his statement but in the one place where would be discussed, the forum.
Well I've had my say for what it's worth (but a tuppence'worth), I'll now go back into to my shell and clam up
I've put it in as new thread as I made it reply oringinally.

Yours respectfully

hotstone04

Offline

#2 August 21st, 2004 05:00 PM

Naomi
Member

Re: The "shag' argument

The great thing about this site is we girls can shoot ourselves the way we want to, and if that involves someone we love, and someone we would like to include in our erotic sharing of ourselves, then that shouldn't be restricted. This site would be porn if it was controlled purely by members who just want to see naked girls in poses. Remember we are people too, and we have our own reasons and desires for doing this. This site is called "I shot myself" not "shoot us down".

keep smiling and look out for my next lot of pics!
naomi

Offline

#3 August 21st, 2004 05:17 PM

Belgareth
Member

Re: The "shag' argument

Naomi wrote:

The great thing about this site is we girls can shoot ourselves the way we want to, and if that involves someone we love, and someone we would like to include in our erotic sharing of ourselves, then that shouldn't be restricted. This site would be porn if it was controlled purely by members who just want to see naked girls in poses. Remember we are people too, and we have our own reasons and desires for doing this. This site is called "I shot myself" not "shoot us down".

keep smiling and look out for my next lot of pics!
naomi

That just about sums up all the arguments Naomi and I couldn't agree with you more!!!! I'm getting a bit fed up of members comments on the way you all present yourselves. As you say - it IS your choice.


[color="Red"]require "help.pl";[/color]

Offline

#4 August 22nd, 2004 03:57 AM

mercucio
Member

Re: The "shag' argument

If they like to show us more, they should show us more.

It´s the artists choice what´s on the pictures.

If some user don´t like to see this, he must not look at this folio...
There some other folios...

PS: I like to see more of the 'shag argument' ... and of course of other folios.....

Offline

#5 August 24th, 2004 01:43 PM

danyboy
Member

Re: The "shag' argument

i am 100% with you...

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB