Oh no way Luv2see.....
Redbird of course feel free to answer but just know that this question does not have a vibe of genuine curiosity or open-hearted interest. Luv2see, prove me wrong. Redbird you have a right to feel anyway you do and you do not have to explain yourself to emotionally inept bullies.
ffs. I should close this stupid thread.
Well stated Viva <3, and thank you for writing my initial thoughts of his statement with more politeness that I can come up with for
these right wing bible thumping jackasses whenever I cross paths with them on forums and Facebook...
Redbird of course feel free to answer but just know that this question does not have a vibe of genuine curiosity or open-hearted interest. Luv2see, prove me wrong. Redbird you have a right to feel anyway you do and you do not have to explain yourself to emotionally inept bullies.
ffs. I should close this stupid thread.
]]>This question is baffling. Objectively though he is not an attractive person at all. I have a pretty broad taste in men but regardless of his actions and position, I could never get it up for Trump. He is undeniably a deplorable man, and that tends to influence a person's opinion on how attractive they are. As you surely already know? Australian contributors have previously commonly stated John Howard and Tony Abbott (past Prime Minsters) as the person they'd least like to see, so it's fair to assume that an individual's lack of desire to see someone naked is at least based in part on whether or not that person is someone who is actively damaging the country they govern.
His actions very much affect the rest of the world, and to say that it doesn't is madness. Every day I struggle with feelings of complete hopelessness, which is largely in part due to him being America's current president.
Redbird I saw your remark that says you struggle with feelings of complete hopelessness which is largely due to Trump. Please explain how Trump causes you these feelings????
]]>Love you!!!!
Anyway, OP was definitely edging a pro-trump agenda, which is a surefire way to fire people up on the internet. I am American. There's a lot of reasons I hightailed it so hard back to Melbourne . One of them was definitely the deplorable political climate in the US. While many people did vote for Trump and will do so again, it's obviously a hotly contested issue not only in the USA, but worldwide.
If you see conservative American presidents coming up so frequently as an example of someone young women all around the world mention when asked who they don't want to see naked, well, I addressed the reason already above. American presidents are not just political. They are also pop culture in ways that presidents and PMs of other places are not. And none more so than reality-tv star, corporate dick-swinging, populist rabble-rousing POS in the White House right now.
The OP was pressing buttons, Leo, and you know it. He asked why we don't want to see Hilary shoot herself - why Trump, and not Hilary? Have you been paying any attention to the general vibe of feminism lately? Do you know we are a website with proud feminist ideals? For many women in the USA and abroad, Hilary Clinton running for and potentially becoming the first female president of the United States far outweighed her politics. She was a symbol. Of course we won't take her down by naming her the person we'd least like to see on our site. Though I don't agree with her politics, I voted for Hilary, and would do so 1000 times, Hilary over Trump. For many of us, her campaign represented hope. Her defeat was our defeat.
And why Trump, and not Obama? Come on. OP is clearly taking the piss. Obama is a 5-alarm panty dropper. Our collective lady-boner for Obama is is so big and hard it can be seen from space. Obama makes us so wet that if the icebergs don't raise sea level, our unceasingly flowing girl-cum will.
If you're genuinely, authentically puzzled, LeoBloom, I hope my repeated explanations are clearing this up for you. Authenticity gets more complicated as we get older, mostly because it's more fun for us that way. Maybe you've forgotten what it's like to be the age of most of our contributors. They're figuring things out, and their "authentic selves" are no one's business but their own. We shift and dance as we explore our identities. What's real? What's left when you take away all our pop-culture references, preferences, attitudes, opinions, arms, legs, names, memories, influences, and anything else that can "hijack our authentic selves"? Are we just a burning ball of incandescent soul-stuff, beings of light which have no end and no beginning? Are we our inner emotional child, weepy and collapsed, willing and helpless? Our excited intellectual passions, aroused and intense, finally angry, speaking up that deep truth she's kept buried? Are we our animal sexuality, panting with need? Are we our anxiety? Our concern? Our deepest secrets? Our hipocrisy?
Give me a break. Leave it to the french deconstructivists. Some of my most authentic expressions of my self have been outright lies.
Look Leo, you seem to have good intentions. I don't doubt the wisdom of your years. I have respect for what you say. But don't come into a womens' space and pointedly question their responses to interview questions, especially by suggesting that their answers may not be "authentic" because they are not he same kind of answers you might give, if asked the same question. And please understand, you can't accuse someone's response of being inauthentic, and separate that from accusing them of BEING inauthentic themselves. It's insulting to suggest that we are just mouthpieces for the zeitgeist, just the internet speaking in the form of naked tits and arse. We're people. If our responses are repetitive, maybe it's because lots of people actually think that thing.
The best thing to do when people tell you what they think is listen. They will show you their authentic selves. All you have to do is believe them. It's actually not very difficult at all.
Also Steve Buscemi is a babe. I would absolutely LOVE a shoot from him.
]]>That was a serious question.
Why is Donald Trump the one person no one wants to see shoot themselves?
Not your PMs, not the Queen, not Obama, not Hillary.
I have ceased to wonder at the hate I see and hear in this country almost daily.
Even from members of my own family.
But what is it about Trump that you object to? His hair?
I doubt that it is hate or dislike or even disagreement with his policies or politics.
For most of you he has no impact on your lives.
Regardless of what our media and perhaps your media believe and promote, we elected him for our reasons and will probably do so again .
I would not care to see him on this site, but he is not at the top of my list.
It's funny that you picked up on his hair as the possible cause for derision, as he certainly is a caricature. Perhaps you're blinkered, because some of his policies would be to your benefit - but as an American you're treated to a somewhat insular view of the man, as shown by your claim that he has no effect on our lives. America is the world's largest economy and he's picking a fight with the second largest, that he can't win. (Our financial market has a saying - "if America sneezes, the Australian stock exchange catches a cold"). Any country he's slapped tariffs on, is losing, but so is the USA because free trade benefits both economies. Meanwhile he's trying to take credit for making progress with N Korea while walking away every time he doesn't get all his demands met, while making no concessions to the other side. The N Koreans just want the powder keg off their doorstep, can you blame them? They've had a million guns pointed right at them for the last 70 years.
When you look at him objectively, as we can from afar, he's clearly dishonest, clearly racist, clearly motivated by self-interest, clearly misogynist (did you HEAR that tape?) and clearly not an intelligent man. He's regressive, and those are qualities that make sapiosexual women not want to see him naked, even if he looked like Trudeau.
And in any case the most popular answer a decade ago was G.W. Bush, for different reasons.
]]>If you see conservative American presidents coming up so frequently as an example of someone young women all around the world mention when asked who they don't want to see naked, well, I addressed the reason already above. American presidents are not just political. They are also pop culture in ways that presidents and PMs of other places are not. And none more so than reality-tv star, corporate dick-swinging, populist rabble-rousing POS in the White House right now.
The OP was pressing buttons, Leo, and you know it. He asked why we don't want to see Hilary shoot herself - why Trump, and not Hilary? Have you been paying any attention to the general vibe of feminism lately? Do you know we are a website with proud feminist ideals? For many women in the USA and abroad, Hilary Clinton running for and potentially becoming the first female president of the United States far outweighed her politics. She was a symbol. Of course we won't take her down by naming her the person we'd least like to see on our site. Though I don't agree with her politics, I voted for Hilary, and would do so 1000 times, Hilary over Trump. For many of us, her campaign represented hope. Her defeat was our defeat.
And why Trump, and not Obama? Come on. OP is clearly taking the piss. Obama is a 5-alarm panty dropper. Our collective lady-boner for Obama is is so big and hard it can be seen from space. Obama makes us so wet that if the icebergs don't raise sea level, our unceasingly flowing girl-cum will.
If you're genuinely, authentically puzzled, LeoBloom, I hope my repeated explanations are clearing this up for you. Authenticity gets more complicated as we get older, mostly because it's more fun for us that way. Maybe you've forgotten what it's like to be the age of most of our contributors. They're figuring things out, and their "authentic selves" are no one's business but their own. We shift and dance as we explore our identities. What's real? What's left when you take away all our pop-culture references, preferences, attitudes, opinions, arms, legs, names, memories, influences, and anything else that can "hijack our authentic selves"? Are we just a burning ball of incandescent soul-stuff, beings of light which have no end and no beginning? Are we our inner emotional child, weepy and collapsed, willing and helpless? Our excited intellectual passions, aroused and intense, finally angry, speaking up that deep truth she's kept buried? Are we our animal sexuality, panting with need? Are we our anxiety? Our concern? Our deepest secrets? Our hipocrisy?
Give me a break. Leave it to the french deconstructivists. Some of my most authentic expressions of my self have been outright lies.
Look Leo, you seem to have good intentions. I don't doubt the wisdom of your years. I have respect for what you say. But don't come into a womens' space and pointedly question their responses to interview questions, especially by suggesting that their answers may not be "authentic" because they are not he same kind of answers you might give, if asked the same question. And please understand, you can't accuse someone's response of being inauthentic, and separate that from accusing them of BEING inauthentic themselves. It's insulting to suggest that we are just mouthpieces for the zeitgeist, just the internet speaking in the form of naked tits and arse. We're people. If our responses are repetitive, maybe it's because lots of people actually think that thing.
The best thing to do when people tell you what they think is listen. They will show you their authentic selves. All you have to do is believe them. It's actually not very difficult at all.
]]>By the way, for what it's worth, my unchecked impression is that, after Trump and Bush, third on the list was Steve Buscemi. I think you're all giving Steve a tough time. Lay off him.
]]>Like Viva said, he is very much one of the main focuses in current pop culture, hence the large amount of people listing him in their bio. He is everywhere.
As I stated earlier, when John Howard and Tony Abbott were PM they were the main answers you'd see from Australians. As ScoMo (the current PM) continues along his destructive path through Australian politics I'm sure we'll see more of him, but as it stands, ol' Trumpy is top dog when it comes to hideous scumbags currently in power.
]]>